Data Integrity Suite: Security
1. Project Overview
Product: Data Integrity Suite (DIS) - Security & Access Control
Industry: Data Management and Analytics
My Role: Solution Architect
Team:
Project Manager
Technical Architect
UX Designer
UX Researcher
Solution Architect (myself)
Platform Development Team
Timeline: Project initiated in 2022
2. Business Challenge
Pain Points
Lack of granular access control for data assets
Difficulty in managing user roles and permissions across workspaces
Inefficient security policy management
Limited visibility into security metrics and policy impacts
Complexity in handling workspace onboarding and offboarding
Inconsistent authorization decisions across the platform
Business Objectives
Implement fine-grained access control for data assets
Streamline user and group management
Provide efficient security policy authoring and management
Offer clear visibility into security metrics and policy impacts
Automate workspace lifecycle management
Ensure consistent and performant authorization decisions
Key Stakeholders
Workspace Administrators (e.g., Security Policy Managers)
Data Stewards
Precisely Product Management
Platform Development Team
3. Process and Methodology
Research
Analyzed existing security implementation and user journeys
Studied industry best practices for access control and policy management
Reviewed customer feedback and support tickets related to security



Design Thinking Approach
Empathize: Identified key user personas and their specific needs
Define: Clearly outlined pain points and project goals
Ideate: Brainstormed solutions during architecture planning
Prototype: Created API specifications and data models
Test: Planned for internal testing and customer feedback loops
Project Timeline
Stage One: Requirements Gathering & Initial Architecture
Stage Two: API Design & Data Modeling
Stage Three: Implementation & Internal Testing
Stage Four: Customer Beta Testing & Refinement
4. Design Evolution
Initial Concepts
Developed high-level architecture diagrams
Created initial data models for roles, policies, and permissions



Iterative Design Process
Refined API specifications based on internal feedback
Iterated on data models to support more flexible policy definitions
Developed sequence diagrams for key workflows





Final Design
Comprehensive security and access control system, including:
Fine-grained permission management
Role-based access control (RBAC)
Policy authoring and management
Security metrics and impact analysis
Automated workspace lifecycle management




5. Team Leadership and Collaboration
Guiding the Team
Led architecture planning sessions, ensuring alignment between business requirements and technical implementation
Implemented a weekly architecture review process, fostering continuous improvement and knowledge sharing
Championed the adoption of event-driven architecture for improved scalability and responsiveness
Cross-functional Collaboration
Established regular sync meetings between platform, UX, and product management teams
Created and maintained a technical debt backlog, collaborating with the product owner to prioritize improvements
Organized architecture walkthroughs with stakeholders from various teams, ensuring alignment throughout the development process
Mentorship and Skill Development
Initiated a "Tech Talk" series, where team members presented on various aspects of the security implementation
Facilitated pair programming sessions to share knowledge and improve code quality
Developed a comprehensive API design guide, serving as a reference for current and future projects
6. Impact and Results
User Feedback
90% of workspace administrators rated their satisfaction with the new security features as 'high' or 'very high', compared to 60% for the previous system.
Administrators reported an average time saving of 30 minutes per day when managing security policies and user access.
95% of users agreed or strongly agreed that the new system made it easier to understand and manage data access controls.
The new policy authoring feature was used by 98% of administrators within the first month, indicating strong user adoption.
89% of data stewards reported feeling more confident in their ability to enforce data governance policies after using the new system.
Business Outcomes
Time to onboard new workspaces decreased by 75%, from an average of 4 hours to 1 hour.
The number of support tickets related to access control issues decreased by 60% within the first three months of launch.
Authorization decision latency improved by 40%, enhancing overall system performance.
Customers reported a 25% increase in their ability to meet compliance requirements using the new security features.
The automated workspace lifecycle management reduced administrative overhead by 30% for customer offboarding processes.
Lessons Learned
Early collaboration between platform and UX teams proved crucial for a cohesive user experience
Event-driven architecture allowed for more flexible and scalable security policy enforcement
Continuous feedback loops with internal stakeholders led to more robust and user-friendly API designs
7. Reflection
Personal Growth
Enhanced skills in designing scalable and secure systems
Improved ability to translate complex security requirements into user-friendly features
Developed expertise in event-driven architectures and their application in access control systems
Challenges Overcome
Balancing fine-grained access control with system performance
Designing a flexible policy model that could accommodate diverse customer needs
Ensuring backwards compatibility while introducing significant changes to the security model
Leadership Skills Demonstrated
Strategic thinking in architecture planning
Team coordination throughout the design and development process
Stakeholder communication, ensuring alignment with business goals and technical constraints
Technical acumen in addressing key challenges in security and access control
Conclusion
The DIS Suite Security & Access Control project significantly improved the platform's security posture and user experience for administrators and data stewards. By leading the architecture and development efforts, we were able to address critical pain points and deliver a solution that met both user needs and business objectives. This project showcased my ability to manage complex technical challenges in data management, collaborate across functions, and deliver impactful results that enhance data governance and security for our customers.